Three Explained UFO Crash Retrievals

Over the years, a high number of alleged UFO crash incidents have been reported, causing a stir in the UFO community and fueling speculation about the existence of extraterrestrial life and secret government operations. While some of these claims are intriguing, it’s important to approach them with a critical and objective mindset, separating fact from fiction. In this section, we will explore three such purported UFO crash retrievals, each with its own set of explanations and controversies.

The first case dates back to April 1897 in Aurora, Texas. According to the reports, a mysterious airborne object crashed on the outskirts of the town, and the remains of a small humanoid creature were allegedly recovered from the wreckage. This incident gained notoriety due to a modern newspaper article describing the event, as well as claims of a gravesite containing the alleged alien body.

Another incident that has garnered significant attention is the alleged UFO crash near Del Rio, Texas, sometime in the late 1940s or early 1950s. The primary source for this claim is a purported eyewitness account by an individual identified as Col. R. B. Willingham, who claimed to have witnessed the crash site while serving as a fighter pilot. However, the details of this account have been subject to scrutiny and inconsistencies.

The Kingman UFO crash, said to have occurred on May 21, 1953, near Kingman, Arizona, has been a subject of ongoing debate and investigation. The primary source for this claim is an interview conducted by two teenagers with a man named Arthur Stansel, who described being transported to a crash site and witnessing the recovery of a UFO and its occupants.

Let us begin by examining the Aurora, Texas incident. While the newspaper article describing the crash has been authenticated, several key details raise doubts about the veracity of the claims. Firstly, in the decade following the alleged incident, two historical accounts of Wise County, where Aurora is located, were published, yet neither contained any mention of such a remarkable event. Given the sensational nature of the claims, one would expect this incident to be thoroughly documented if it had indeed occurred.

Furthermore, during interviews conducted in 1971 by researcher Kevin Randle, a local resident named Brawley Oates, whose hands were purportedly disfigured from handling the wreckage, explicitly stated that the crash had never taken place. While some have suggested radiation at the alleged burial site as evidence, these claims remain unsubstantiated and open to interpretation.

Moving on to the Del Rio incident, the primary source, Col. R. B. Willingham, has been the subject of significant scrutiny. Willingham’s account has been plagued by inconsistencies, with the date of the alleged crash changing multiple times in his retellings. Additionally, there are discrepancies regarding his military service, with no official records substantiating his claim of being a fighter pilot.

Willingham’s credibility is further called into question by his apparent embellishment of his military credentials and the lack of corroborating evidence or witnesses to support his claims. The shifting details and absence of verifiable information cast serious doubt on the reliability of his testimony.

Regarding the Kingman incident, the primary source, Arthur Stansel, made contradictory statements that undermine the validity of his account. During the interview with the teenagers, Stansel admitted that he had a tendency to fabricate stories when under the influence of alcohol, and he had indeed been drinking before the interview.

Moreover, the affidavit Stansel purportedly signed was under the name “Fritz Werner,” which was not his real name, rendering the document legally invalid. The inconsistencies and acknowledged propensity for embellishment raise legitimate concerns about the truthfulness of Stansel’s claims.