Losing Disclosure?

At the other end of the spectrum, whistleblower David Grusch, the former Air Force intelligence officer, told a select group of highly-placed people recently that he had learned about a forty-foot craft that had been recovered by the government that could manipulate time and space so that it was the size of a football field on the inside. Those familiar with Dr. Who, the British science fiction program, recognized this as one of the attributes of the TARDIS, the doctor’s time machine using for traveling around the galaxy.

Here is something that Grusch said that changes the conversation if the information is accurate. According to Grush, he, with other intelligence officials, was trained to track UAP in the atmosphere or in orbit, using a unique frequency that is emitted by the UAP. This might have something to do with the EM Effects reported in the close approach of some UFOs. The most extreme example of this are the sightings and stalling of car engines in and around Levelland, Texas, in November 1957 which the Air Force wrote off as ball lightning, a ridiculous notion. I wrote a book about those sightings and some incredible revelations about some of the witnesses. That book was cleverly entitled Levelland.

Grusch said that at one point, one of the competitors with the US, was going to tell of the existence of non-human intelligences to gain some sort of advantage over the United States. This might be a reference to a head of state confirming that there were crash recovered vehicles. Steve Bassett did point out some interesting aspects of that in my conversation with him just last week.

Grusch did provide the name of one of the other officers involved in this, Jay Stratton. This was in connection with claims that he, Grusch and other whistleblowers had been threatened in an attempt to silence them.

Stratton served for more than 32 years in the Army, Air Force, Air Force Reserve and the Federal Civil Service (As did I, except for the Federal Civil Service. I was in the Army National Guard instead.) His current assignment is the Senior Analyst, Nimitz Operational Intelligence Center, ONI (Mine, for those interested, is retired officer). He is responsible for delivering comprehensive intelligence to Navy leadership that would include information about crash recoveries.

Government secrecy surrounding the UFO phenomenon has been a contentious issue for decades. Despite mounting evidence and credible witness testimonies, authorities have been reluctant to fully disclose their knowledge, fueling suspicion and conspiracy theories.

Critics argue that the continued secrecy is counterproductive and only serves to erode public trust. They contend that transparency is important in addressing the legitimate concerns of citizens and fostering an informed dialogue about this enigmatic subject.

Proponents of disclosure argue that the public has a right to know the truth about potential extraterrestrial visitations and the implications they might hold for humanity. They assert that withholding such significant information undermines the principles of democratic governance and accountability.

However, those favoring secrecy often cite national security concerns and the potential for public panic as justifications for their stance. They argue that premature or uncontrolled disclosure could have destabilizing effects on society and international relations.

Additionally, there is a fear that revealing advanced technologies obtained from studying alleged extraterrestrial craft could compromise strategic advantages and disrupt the global balance of power. Skeptics also question the veracity of claims made by whistleblowers, citing the potential for disinformation campaigns or misinterpretations.

Ultimately, the debate over disclosure highlights the complex interplay between governmental transparency, national security interests, and the public’s right to knowledge. Striking the right balance remains a contentious challenge, with both sides presenting compelling arguments for their respective positions.